Election
could drive minimum wage hike
By Lisa Girion, Molly Hennessy-Fiske and P.J.
Huffstutter
Los Angeles Times, 11/9/06 (also Chicago
Tribune)
The
first raise in the U.S. minimum wage in a decade
has become a very likely possibility following
Tuesday's Democratic election victories and passage
of minimum-wage ballot measures in six states.
President
Bush suggested Wednesday that he would agree to
a hike in the federal minimum, set at $5.15 an
hour since 1997. This could restore a bit of California's
competitive edge by making its recently passed
minimum-wage hike less out of line with other
states.
But
California lawmakers also might be pressured to
enact legislation that links minimum-wage increases
to inflation, following inclusion of cost-of-living
indexing provisions in all six state ballot measures.
Republican legislators and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger
have fought such provisions.
"If
they won't do it, we'll go to the ballot,"
said Jen Kern, director of the Washington-based
Living Wage Resource Center, which helped organize
many of the initiative campaigns. "Because
when we go to the ballot, you see what happens."
The
success of the minimum-wage measures illustrates
how organized labor and its allies are achieving
workplace gains at the ballot box that they couldn't
get at the bargaining table. Another example came
in San Francisco on Tuesday, when voters passed
an unprecedented measure guaranteeing paid sick
days to city workers.
Labor
activists said their victories Tuesday had emboldened
them to seek similar measures in other states.
But
critics saw the measures as misguided attempts
to put complex economic issues before voters when
legislators really should have been deciding them.
California
moved before the midterm elections to raise minimum-wage
rates. In a deal with Democratic lawmakers, the
governor signed a bill in September that raises
the state's minimum-wage to $8 an hour from $6.75
in two steps culminating on Jan. 1, 2008.
But
California's compromise does not include inflation
indexing, which was one of the most significant
labor victories of Tuesday's elections. The addition
of the six states now means there are 10 states
with inflation indexing attached to their minimum-wage
rules. Twenty-eight states now have minimum wages
above the federal level.
Small-business
owners and other opponents of the measures said
voters might not have realized that in approving
minimum-wage hikes they also were authorizing
ongoing inflation adjustments.
"Our
ballot initiative was four pages long," said
Michelle Bolton, the Arizona director of the National
Federation of Independent Businesses. "Proponents
of the measure weren't even talking about the
indexing provision."
Several
of the newly adopted minimum-wage measures also
included other provisions. Nevada's allows employers
to opt out of the $1 hike, to $6.15 an hour, by
providing sufficient health coverage for workers.
And in Arizona and Ohio, the measures create more
record-keeping for employers.
Most
of the measures, which also were adopted in Montana,
Colorado and Missouri, are set to take effect
Jan. 1.
"We're
absolutely elated," said the Rev. W. Audrey
Hollis, an organizer for Jobs with Justice in
St. Louis, who campaigned for a measure that will
boost Missouri's minimum wage from $5.15 to $6.50,
or the federal rate, whichever is higher.
"No
one can live on $5.15 an hour," she said.
"These are people who can't afford rent."
The
extra pay will mean a lot to Eli Washington, 19,
a high school senior in St. Louis trying to save
money for college.
"It's
sort of embarrassing to say you earn minimum wage,"
said Washington, who has worked at a burger restaurant
since he was 17. "But it's going to get me
to being on my own even faster."
Economists
said higher wages drove up employer costs, prompting
them to raise prices, lay off workers -- or both.
Esmael Adibi, director of the Anderson Center
for Economic Research at Chapman University in
Orange, said the last wave of minimum-wage hikes
by states had put a damper on job growth by pushing
employers to move low- and unskilled production
work overseas.
"Obviously
it's going to help people who are employed at
minimum wage," Adibi said. "However,
I would argue that over the long run it's going
to reduce employment opportunities for some people."
Additional
costs were not a concern for all employers. In
Nevada, for example, the labor market is so tight
that most employers already pay more than minimum
wage to attract workers -- even dishwashers and
pizza delivery drivers, said Jim Denton, a spokesman
for an employer coalition. One study found that
only about 5,000 workers in Nevada were making
minimum wage.
But
the employer coalition opposed the measure's requirement
that Nevada's minimum stay $1 higher than the
federal rate because it would tie state lawmakers'
hands.
The
National Restaurant Assn. condemned the initiative
process as flawed.
"A
new minimum wage is going to have consequences
throughout the economy," said Tom Foulkes,
vice president of state relations for the organization.
"We think it's dangerous to put economic
policies on an already crowded ballot."
Foulkes
said economic policies ought to be the province
of legislators who were in a better position to
consider their consequences.
"I
don't think your average voter is going to sit
down and read an economic impact study on anything
before he goes to the polls," he said. "That's
a lot to ask, especially when you have a very
crowded ballot."
If
the Democrats headed for the leadership of the
House have their way, lawmakers will be considering
a hike in the federal rate as soon as the new
Congress is seated in January.
Bush
said he expected Democrats and Republicans to
find "common ground" in federal minimum
wage legislation. Bush and Republicans previously
had resisted hiking the wage.
"There
are parts of the country that are not seeing as
rapid economic growth, so you have to take that
into consideration also," White House Deputy
Press Secretary Tony Fratto said. "The bottom
line is that the president has said if Congress
presents him an appropriate minimum wage increase,
he would support it. Let's just see what emerges
from Congress."
House
Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco),
set to become speaker, said a minimum-wage hike
is one of the goals the new Democratic-controlled
Congress hopes to accomplish when it convenes
in January.
Sen.
Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) proposed legislation
earlier this year to raise the federal minimum
wage to $7.25, but Republicans prevented him from
bringing it to a vote. On Wednesday, Kennedy said
his party's leaders had promised to put his bill
to an immediate vote. Kennedy's staff said a vote
could even come during this month's lame duck
session.
Because
of inflation, workers on the bottom rung of the
pay scale are able to buy less today than a decade
ago. But Kennedy's proposal would more than make
up for lost ground, economists said.
"A
hike to $7.25 would put its real [inflation-adjusted]
value higher than in the 1980s and 1990s but lower
than in the 1960s and 1970s," noted Nigel
Gault, chief U.S. economist for research firm
Global Insight. "Part of the federal increase
will merely catch up with higher minimums already
in place in roughly half of the states."
Rep.
George Miller (D-Martinez), who is expected to
lead the House Education and Workforce Committee,
said the minimum wage would be among his top three
priorities.
"Democrats
will work in a bipartisan way with Republicans
so that, together, we can take our country in
a new direction," Miller said in a statement.
"We will work to ensure not only that the
economy grows but that all families benefit from
it."
The
Rev. Paul Sherry, national coordinator for the
Let Justice Roll campaign that helped build support
for this year's ballot initiatives, said the faith-based
group plans to focus on raising the minimum wage
in Kansas, Oklahoma, Tennessee, New Hampshire
and Georgia.
Sherry,
a retired former president of the United Church
of Christ, said the fact that minimum wage initiatives
passed while those banning gay marriage and abortion
failed showed that supporters made it the "values
issue" of this election.
The
Assn. of Community Organizations for Reform Now,
in cooperation with the AFL-CIO, is sponsoring
minimum wage organizing events next week in 103
cities, including Los Angeles and Long Beach.
"If
Congress doesn't move quickly to raise the minimum
wage, we're moving forward in every single state
we're in," said Kern of the Living Wage Resource
Center, which is part of the association.
lisa.girion@latimes.com
molly.hennessy-fiske@latimes.com
p.j.huffstutter@latimes.com
Copyright
2006 Los Angeles Times
# # #
|